Concept Engine Results


Software
 Scientific 
Research & summaries produced by Software Scientific Ltd

On 07/03/02 Software Scientific's Concept Engine TM read 9,533 documents and considered 239,766 links

Research based on Spacecraft autonomy excluding internet on the area of artificial intelligence, onboard software, satellite, long duration missions

Relevant Documents | Contacts

Relevant Documents

These documents are arranged in order of relevance to your query. See also Relevant Documents | Contacts

DocumentSummary
Remote Agent
90% (1)
http: //www. cise. ufl. edu/ ~ddd/ cap6635/ Fall- 97/ Short- papers/ c. htm
30/11/1997

Remote Agent

This 1st paper of a 2-part series introduces current research on a new spacecraft autonomy architecture, named Remote Agent, which applies AI ?  techniques to spacecraft control functions. i  This paper describes current research on a new spacecraft autonomy architecture using AI ?  (AI) techniques to challenging computational problems in planning & scheduling, & real-time monitoring & control. i  NASA views spacecraft autonomy as a major design goal & autonomous spacecraft mission planning & control will become more prominent. i  1   This paper is the 1st of a 2-part series & introduces Remote Agent, a spacecraft software architecture utilizing AI ?  & currently being developed by NASA. The spacecraft autonomy concept was primarily intended to enable spacecraft to continue with their mission in case of temporary loss of communication contact with ground control. To assist in reaching a higher level of autonomy, a more proper ground control/spacecraft organizational structure has been proposed ( by the Standard Generic Approach to Spacecraft Autonomy & Automation, SGASAA) based on a new, more elaborate concept of autonomy.   i   i  A spacecraft software architecture utilizing AI ? , known as Remote Agent, shares the same basic goal of operating & controlling a spacecraft with minimal human assistance. i  JPL has been designated the lead NASA center for spacecraft autonomy not only as of the nature of its missions but also as of its unique combination of resident expertise in AI, spacecraft engineering, space mission design, & systems engineering. i  The product of the Autonomy team will be the flight & ground software & hardware needed to enable onboard & ground-based autonomous capabilities & the associated computer-based tools & processes required to replicate these capabilities in subsequent missions.  i 
Section 367 Papers & Publications
89% (2)
http: //cs. jpl. nasa. gov/ pub. shtml
unknown date

Section 367 Papers & Publications

Science-Driven Spacecraft Autonomy
Knowledge Acquisition for the Onboard Planner of an Autonomous Spacecraft
Inferred Sensors & Planned Resources: Modular Components for Autonomy-Aware Spacecraft Flight Software
Evolvable Hardware for Spacecraft Autonomy
Onboard Autonomy for Space Exploration
Representing Spacecraft Mission Planning Knowledge in ASPEN
Spacecraft Autonomy & the Missions of Exploration
The Impact of Autonomy Technology on Spacecraft Software Architecture
Validation & Verification of the Remote Agent For Spacecraft Autonomy
ESA Workshop on "On-Board Autonomy" - Second Announcement and Preliminary Programme
87% (3)
http: //www. estec. esa. nl/ conferences/ 01C06/
12/10/2001

ESA Workshop on "On-Board Autonomy" - Second Announcement and Preliminary Programme

 i  The workshop will attempt to provide recommendations on suitable technologies, available or being developed in the ESA member states, & which should be included in future ESA-managed research activities, in support of space mission users, operators & spacecraft & mission designers. i 
  1. In flight Autonomy demonstration (...) for single or multi-spacecraft missions, & to include demonstrated capabilities & lessons learned from such experiences in the past.
  2. Requirements for future space missions & necessary evolution of On-Board Autonomy The workshop will attempt to identify
    • usefulness of onboard space autonomy, "mission customised vs.
    • suitable target missions for deploying "system autonomy", on ground &/or on board.
2001) will be devoted to the space domain requirements & evolution for autonomy : potential for future missions, user requirements, trends for future payloads, ground & spacecraft evolution, etc..   i 
Spacecraft Autonomous Navigation for the BIRD Satellite Mission,Gill E, eberhard.
Autonomy Roadmap for Long-Term Human Space Missions,Kortenkamp D., kortekamp@jsc.
Onboard Autonomy Software on the 3 Corner Sat MissionE. Hansen & Chien Steve, chien@aig.
 i 
A Remote Agent Prototype for Spacecraft Autonomy - Pell, Bernard, Chien, Gat, Muscettola, Nayak, Wagner, Williams (ResearchIndex)
87% (4)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ pell96remote. html
6/3/2002

A Remote Agent Prototype for Spacecraft Autonomy - Pell, Bernard, Chien, Gat, Muscettola, Nayak, Wagner, Williams (ResearchIndex)

ps Cached: PS.gz PS PDF Image Update Help From: nasa.gov/ic/projects/E ... autonomy (more) From: nasa.gov/ic/projects/E ... autonomy Home: B.Pell HPSearch (...)
A crucial element in achieving this vision is onboard spacecraft autonomy, requiring us to automate functions which have traditionally been achieved on ground by humans. These include planning activities, sequencing spacecraft actions, tracking spacecraft state, ensuring correct functioning, recovering in cases of failure & reconfiguring hardware. i  to the expected growth of missions & mission capabilities. i  The Remote Agent (RA) [12, 13] will be the 1st AI ?  based autonomy architecture to reside in the flight processor of a spacecraft & control it ...system, the Remote Agent (RA) RA is an AI ?  based control system derived from the NewMaap technology demonstration [1] . html More @misc{ pell96remote, author = "B. Pell & D. Bernard & S. Chien & E. Gat & N. Muscettola & P. Nayak & M. Wagner & B. Williams", title = "A remote agent prototype for spacecraft autonomy", text = "Pell, B., Bernard, D., Chien, S., Gat, E., Muscettola, N., Nayak, P., Wagner, M. & Williams, B. 1996. A remote agent prototype for spacecraft autonomy. i  Wilkins, Myers - 1995 28 AI ?  (...) - de Kleer, Williams - 1991 26 Just-in-case scheduling (...) - Drummond, Bresina et al. - i  (1997) (...) Plan Execution for Autonomous Spacecraft - Barney Pell (1996) (...) Automating Mission Scheduling for Space-Based Observatories - Nicola Muscettola (1995) (...) Sample documents with summaries: Summarize this document Modulation & Information Hiding in Images - Joshua R. Smith, Barrett ...
Spacecraft Information Systems
87% (5)
http: //fstsrv. jpl. nasa. gov/ library/ papers/ avionix/ Avionix6. html
18/9/2001

Spacecraft Information Systems

 i  Systems which are neither automated nor autonomous include some early satellites which were basically collections of sensors & actuators in space & relied on continuous monitoring & commanding by mission operations staff. i  While these tend to be somewhat automated already, they shouldn't be considered to be autonomous until the human controllers give up their control of these mission phases & allow the spacecraft to make its own decisions about which actions are appropriate given the set of conditions that actually prevail at the time of the actions. i  By these definitions, JPL has built automated spacecraft but not autonomous ones; our spacecraft perform many operations automatically but we generally like to know exactly how they will be done. i  For some missions, this proximity to data may also make it advantageous to move functionality to the spacecraft in order to trade on-board processing power for telecom power. While there is potentially more bandwidth on the spacecraft as its  ? closer to the sources of data, it is likely to remain the case for quite some time that processing capabilities on the ground will exceed those available on spacecraft by several orders of magnitude. i  In the case of spacecraft/ground interactions, its  ? likely to be better to capture all the spacecraft engineers' knowledge in the delivered spacecraft rather than putting part of it in the spacecraft & part in the ground system. i  Terminal autonomy" might describe a system which accepts exactly one goal & then proceeds to its end-of-mission (e. i  Whether a spacecraft is large or small, its  ? unlikely that it would be cost-effective to execute HRG support software in a shared computer. The long-duration nature of deep-space missions leads to the need for maintainable software. i 
Applications of artificial intelligence for spacecraft autonomy and enhanced science data return
87% (6)
http: //materials. searchabstracts- asap. com/ info/ com. csa_ materials_ A00- 42891. html? se= ink
unknown date

Applications of artificial intelligence for spacecraft autonomy and enhanced science data return

Title: Abstract: This paper discusses research & development of applications of AI ?  technology at JPL which solve mission-specific challenges in the areas of spacecraft autonomy & enhanced science return. These applications are a component of JPL\'s long term program to develop autonomy technology which enables the exploration of uncertain, changing environments & which supports creation of a vigilant, sustained presence in space. A broad array of AI ?  applications are underway at JPL & a selection of these will be surveyed with particular focus in the areas of self-commanding spacecraft, distributed autonomous systems, & closed-loop science autonomy. The paper ties these areas together & concludes by highlighting the key challenges for AI ?  & autonomy technology which arise in future exploration missions to the solar system. (Author) |Author: Atkinson, David J; Chien, Steve A; Mjolsness, Eric D |Source: AIAA Space 2000 Conference & Exposition, Long Beach, CA, Sept. 19-21, 2000 |Descriptors: AI ? ; Spacecraft Autonomy; Science; Interplanetary Spacecraft; Space Exploration; Solar System; Maintenance; Space Robots; Feedback Control
http: //www. ee. surrey. ac. uk/ Personal/ N. Monekosso/ abst0797. htm
87% (7)
http: //www. ee. surrey. ac. uk/ Personal/ N. Monekosso/ abst0797. htm
2/6/1997

"http: //www. ee. surrey. ac. uk/ Personal/ N. Monekosso/ abst0797. htm"

On-board spacecraft autonomy is expected to bring significant changes to space missions. i  Spacecraft autonomy will improve on the management of resources & of increasingly complex & demanding payloads thus resulting in improved product return. i  Certain types of missions are only possible with high levels of on-board autonomy. These include missions to the outer planets & beyond for which the light or radio signal travel time is too long to accommodate real time control & the spacecraft will spend long periods of time out of sight of ground stations.   In recent years, researchers have, applied AI ?  techniques & other new technologies e. knowledge based systems, decentralised & distributed architectures, to spacecraft autonomy. i  The spacecraft autonomy research project began with a thorough exploration of the need for & advantages of on-board autonomy. Having established the need for on-board autonomy, an architectural design study trading off centralised & decentralised architectures for spacecraft control was carried out. i  The research has shown that its  ? possible for the spacecraft to remain safe & on-board operations planning continue in the event of loss of spacecraft status information resulting from communication breakdown between critically interacting units, including between spacecraft & ground, or loss (...) of on-board functions eg ?  orbit determination,.... i 
http: //www- aig. jpl. nasa. gov/ public/ planning/ bibliography. html
86% (8)
http: //www- aig. jpl. nasa. gov/ public/ planning/ bibliography. html
9/5/2000

"http: //www- aig. jpl. nasa. gov/ public/ planning/ bibliography. html"

Integrating Model-based AI ?  Planning with Procedural Elaboration for Onboard Spacecraft Autonomy, "SpaceOps 2000, Toulouse, France, June 2000. B. Smith, "An Automated Planning System for Designing Spacecraft Missions," 3rd International Symposium on Intelligent Automation & Control, World Automation Congress, Hawaii, June 11-16, 2000 B. Smith, M. Feather, N. Muscettola, "Challenges & Methods in Validating the Remote Agent Planner" in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on AI ?  Planning & Scheduling, Breckenridge, CO, Apr 2000. (PDF) Jonsson, Morris, Muscettola, Rajan, & Smith, "Planning in Interplanetary Space: Theory & Practice" in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on AI ?  Planning Systems, Breckenridge, CO, Apr 2000. i  (PostScript) (PDF) F. Fisher, T. Estlin, D. Mutz, S. Chien, "Using AI ?  Planning to Generate Antenna Tracking Plans", Eleventh Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-99), Orlando, Florida, July 1999. i  (PostScript) (PDF) G. Rabideau, R. Knight, S. Chien, A. Fukunaga, A. Govindjee, "Iterative Repair Planning for Spacecraft Operations in the ASPEN System," International Symposium on AI ?  Robotics & Automation in Space (ISAIRAS), Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 1999. (PostScript) (PDF) F. Fisher, T. Estlin, D. Mutz, L. Paal, E. Law, M. Stockett, N. Golshan, S. Chien, "An AI Approach to Ground Station Autonomy for Deep Space Communications", International Symposium on AI ?  Robotics & Automation in Space (ISAIRAS), Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 1999. i  (PostScript) (PDF) A. Barrett, "Autonomy Architectures for a Constellation of Spacecraft," International Symposium on AI ?  Robotics & Automation in Space (ISAIRAS), Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 1999. i  (PostScript) (PDF) Smith, B., Millar, W., Dunphy, J., Tung, Y., Nayak, P., Gamble, E., & Clark, M., "Validation & Verification of the Remote Agent for Spacecraft Autonomy," Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference (IAC), Aspen, CO. i 
Validation and Verification of the Remote Agent for Spacecraft Autonomy - Smith, Millar, Dunphy, wen, Nayak, Jr, Clark (ResearchIndex)
86% (9)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ smith99validation. html
6/3/2002

Validation and Verification of the Remote Agent for Spacecraft Autonomy - Smith, Millar, Dunphy, wen, Nayak, Jr, Clark (ResearchIndex)

(...)
Abstract: The 6-day Remote Agent Experiment (RAX) on the Deep Space 1 mission will be the 1st time that an artificially intelligent agent will control a NASA spacecraft. Successful completion of this experiment will open the way for AI-based autonomy technology on future missions. An important validation objective for RAX is implementation of a credible validation & verification strategy for RAX that also "scales up" to missions that make full use of spacecraft autonomy. Autonomous flight software presents novel & difficult testing challenges that traditional flight software (FSW) doesn't face. 1998 3 : Design of the remote agent experiment for spacecraft autonomy - Bernard, Dorais et al. - 1997 BibTeX entry: (Update) Smith, B.; Millar, W.; Dunphy, J.; wen Tung, Y.; Nayak, P. P.; Jr., E. B. G.; & Clark, M. 1999. Validation & verification of the Remote Agent for spacecraft autonomy.html More @misc{ smith99validation, author = "B. Smith & W. Millar & J. Dunphy & Y. wen & P. Nayak & E. Jr & M. Clark", title = "Validation & verification of the Remote Agent for spacecraft autonomy", text = "Smith, B.; Millar, W.; Dunphy, J.; wen Tung, Y.; Nayak, P. P.; Jr., E. B. G.; & Clark, M. 1999. Validation & verification of the Remote Agent for spacecraft autonomy.html" } Citations (...): 24 Compiling Complex Database Transition Triggers (...) - Cohen - 1989 22 Computer Networks & ISDN Systems (...) - Holzmann - 1993 13 A Remote Agent Prototype for Spacecraft Autonomy - Pell, Bernard et al. - i  (...) Representing Spacecraft Mission Planning Knowledge in ASPEN - Ben Smith (...) Mission Operations with an Autonomous Agent - Barney Pell (1998) (...) Sample documents with summaries: Summarize this document Modulation & Information Hiding in Images - Joshua R. Smith, Barrett ...
Mission Types
85% (10)
http: //www. atmosp. physics. utoronto. ca/ people/ ben/ pages/ mission_ categories. htm
25/1/2002

Mission Types

Working either from high geostationary orbits or in orbiting constellations configured to cover the area of service, communications satellites have long design lifetimes (...) & usually low attitude-stabilisation requirements. Missions are simple: a spacecraft is launched to provide a particular service, maneuvered into the required orbit & activated to fulfil the intended purpose. Spacecraft have little autonomy beyond basic attitude control & are operated largely by telecommand. Spacecraft used to provide continuous coverage of a particular area, eg ?  weather satellites, are placed in geostationary orbits with moderate stabilisation requirements. Other spacecraft, including military spy satellites, track across the surface of the earth are placed in low (...) earth orbits of 700-1000 Km scanning the earth using a variety of instruments from optical telescopes to Radar. These spacecraft require a larger degree of autonomy as they are often out of communication with ground support. Spacecraft are operated in an orbit or trajectory dependent on the particular mission. i  Such spacecraft must have a degree of autonomy since communication delays to earth are measured in minutes or sometimes hours. These types of mission are among the most technologically challenging for spacecraft design. i 
ISR - August 1997 - AAAI Report
85% (11)
http: //www. lionhrtpub. com/ ISR/ ISR- 8- 97/ Cover. html
20/10/2000

ISR - August 1997 - AAAI Report

Lionheart Publishing Software Surveys i  The defining goal of AI ? , he noted, is not to build an artificial person, but rather, to create intelligent behavior.Out of This World The Pathfinder mission to Mars — particularly the Sojourner robot — has put a lot of bounce in the step of AI developers lately, & understandably so. i  delivered a stirring address on the emergence of spacecraft autonomy, highlighting the role of AI ?  & AI developers in keeping NASA financially able to continue funding planetary exploration projects like Pathfinder.   "The single greatest driver which has led to the emergence of spacecraft autonomy as a legitimate, perhaps critical application of AI technologies within NASA is the need to reduce the lifecycle costs of space missions," Doyle said. Autonomy technology will help reduce mission operations costs, through the automation of spacecraft functions, as well as closing loops onboard & decoupling spacecraft from ground. Autonomy will also contribute to a reduction in the ground workforce needed for mission support.   The Remote Agent is NASA's showcase effort in spacecraft autonomy, according to Doyle. i  The irony of the situation, is that Deep Blue doesn't have any AI ? , & its creators have never made any claim that it did. i 
Advanced Simulation Environment for Autonomous Spacecraft - Biesiadecki, Jain, James (ResearchIndex)
85% (12)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ biesiadecki97advanced. html
7/3/2002

Advanced Simulation Environment for Autonomous Spacecraft - Biesiadecki, Jain, James (ResearchIndex)

(...)
Abstract: NASA is developing technology to increase spacecraft on-board autonomy, in an effort to reduce overall mission cost & mission operations resources. Achievement of this objective requires the development of a new class of ground-based autonomy testbeds that can enable rapid development, test, & integration of the new autonomous spacecraft flight software. This paper describes the development of the Autonomy Testbed Environment (ATBE), designed to address these needs. 1 INTRODUCTION The Autonomy Testbed Environment (ATBE) supports spacecraft simulation over a wide range of engineering platforms, functional & fidelity models, fault injection, test scenarios & duration.... Darts Dshell is a multi mission spacecraft simulator with a real time computational engine for flexible multi body... James Jet Repulsion (...) Active bibliography (...): More All 0.5 : A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy - Jeffrey Biesiadecki (1996) (...) 0.3 : Forward Dynamics Algorithms for Multibody Chains & Contact - Pai, Ascher, Kry (2000) (...) 0.3 : May 28, 1999 - (...) Users who viewed this document also viewed: More All 0.0 : Analysis of the Dynamics..... -.,.-.,. () (.) : .. - () () : .. - i  on AI ? , Robotics & Automation in Space, Tokyo, Japan, Jul 1997. i  (...) - Jain, Man - 1992 1 A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy - Biesiadecki, Jain - 1996 1 libSim Simulator Model Development Library (...) - Biesiadecki - 1996 Documents on the same site (http://dshell.html): More A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy - Jeffrey Biesiadecki (1996) (...) A Spatial Operator Algebra for Manipulator Modeling &.. -
Design of the Remote Agent Experiment for Spacecraft Autonomy - Bernard, Dorais, Fry, Jr, Kanefsky, Kurien, Millar, Muscettola, Nayak, Pell, Rajan, Rouquette, Smith, Williams (ResearchIndex)
85% (13)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ bernard98design. html
6/3/2002

Design of the Remote Agent Experiment for Spacecraft Autonomy - Bernard, Dorais, Fry, Jr, Kanefsky, Kurien, Millar, Muscettola, Nayak, Pell, Rajan, Rouquette, Smith, Williams (ResearchIndex)

(...)
Abstract: This paper describes the Remote Agent flight experiment for spacecraft commanding & control. In the Remote Agent approach, the operational rules & constraints are encoded in the flight software. The software may be considered to be an autonomous "remote agent" of the spacecraft operators in the sense that the operators rely on the agent to achieve particular goals. i  1998b) The RA will be the 1st AI ?  based autonomy architecture to ... BibTeX entry: (Update) Bernard, D. E.; Dorais, G. A.; Fry, C.; Jr., E. B. G.; Kanefsky, B.; Kurien, J.; Millar, W.; Muscettola, N.; Nayak, P. P.; Pell, B.; Rajan, K.; Rouquette, N.; Smith, B.; & Williams, B. C. 1998. Design of the remote agent experiment for spacecraft autonomy.html More @misc{ bernard98design, author = "D. Bernard & G. Dorais & C. Fry & E. Jr & B. Kanefsky & J. Kurien & W. Millar & N. Muscettola & P. Nayak & B. Pell & K. Rajan & N. Rouquette & B. Smith & B. Williams", title = "Design of the remote agent experiment for spacecraft autonomy", text = "Bernard, D. E.; Dorais, G. A.; Fry, C.; Jr., E. B. G.; Kanefsky, B.; Kurien, J.; Millar, W.; Muscettola, N.; Nayak,..;.,.;.,.;.,.;.,.;.,......... (...) - Gat - 1996 28 AI ?  (...) - de Kleer, Williams - 1991 27 Formal analysis of a spacecraft controller using SPIN - Havelund, Lowry et al. - 1997 13 A Remote Agent Prototype for Spacecraft Autonomy - Pell, Bernard et al. - i  (...) Representing Spacecraft Mission Planning Knowledge in ASPEN - Ben Smith (...) Mission Operations with an Autonomous Agent - Barney Pell (1998) (...) Sample documents with summaries: Summarize this document On Tiling as a Loop Transformation - Jingling XueTowards an Algebra of Actors - Mauro Gaspari Apr--... -
Three Corner Sat Autonomy
85% (14)
http: //threecornersat. jpl. nasa. gov/
1/6/2001

Three Corner Sat Autonomy

The 3 Corner Sat (3CS) satellite project is a mission being developed jointly by Arizona State University (ASU), The University of Colorado, Boulder (CU), & New Mexico State University (NMSU). i  The principal instrument on 3CS are digital cameras onboard each of the 3 spacecraft. A total of 12 cameras (...) reside within the 3CS constellation, 4 onboard each of the 3 spacecraft. i   i  1st, the onboard execution system for 3CS is the Spacecraft Command Language (SCL) which has been flow previously by CSGC on the DATA-CHASER shuttle payload & was used for automation of Clementine & FUSE as well as other missions. i  CASPER will demonstrate onboard continuous planning to enable the 3CS constellation to respond to mission anomalies as well as validate science data onboard. i  For the 3CS mission, CASPER will be managing the onboard execution including: engineering activities (...), science imaging activities (...), as well as interacting with downlink activities. i   i   i   i  The 3CS mission is scheduled for launch in the summer of 2002, with the software design, development, & integration already underway with integration milestones continuously throughout the spring & summer of 2001. i  The 3CS mission will demonstrate significant onboard autonomy including: robust execution using SCL, onboard planning using CASPER, & onboard anomaly detection using SELMON. i  S. Chien, B. Engelhardt, R. Knight, G. Rabideau, R. Sherwood, E. Hansen, A. Ortiviz, C. Wilklow, S. Wichman , "Onboard Autonomy on the 3 Corner Sat Mission," Proceedings of the 2001 International Symposium on AI ? , Robotics, & Automation for Space, Montreal, Canada, June 2001. i   i 
Ben Smith Publications
85% (15)
http: //www- aig. jpl. nasa. gov/ public/ home/ smith/ publications. html
7/3/2000

Ben Smith Publications

 i 
Autonomy
85% (16)
http: //www. cs. und. edu/ ~hexmoor/ CV/ PUBLICATIONS/ flairs99. htm
1/2/1999

Autonomy

Autonomy in Spacecraft Software Architecture   i  We have developed a few metrics for quantification of autonomy in systems.   Introduction   As more complex systems are being developed, there is greater need for quantifying their level of autonomy (...). i  This notion of autonomy is desirable in systems eg ?  autonomous space applications needed in long-duration space missions.   i  In spacecraft software where a human user is in ultimate control of the agent, the agent is not required to introspect about its level of autonomy. i  This metric can be useful for autonomy software by monitoring the level of resource management. i  These metrics can be used in measuring a degree of autonomy in complex systems eg ?  systems for the spacecraft. Such metrics will aid in designing software that is robust & can be used in autonomous control of spacecraft.   AI ?  & mobile robots. i 
Millennium Space Ship
85% (17)
http: //www. earthportals. com/ Portal_ Ship/ newship. html
26/8/2001

Millennium Space Ship

 i  To cut operations staff, New Millennium will develop more intelligent spacecraft, onboard autonomy, robotic spacecraft & shorter flight time. " i  "We have to move from the old method of sending a single spacecraft out as observers, to having a virtual presence with multiple spacecraft operating solar system wide. " i  Instead of large ground operations staff, the spacecraft would have more onboard autonomy. Missions of the future that drive the New Millennium program include a Mars network of spacecraft, outer planet orbiters, landers on satellites, solar probes or orbiters, Earth- observing network missions, networks of magnetosphere & ionospheric mapping satellites, multiple spacecraft interferometer constellations to detect & image...,......,... i  We think the answer is miniaturization - which must be done without losing capability - & infusing technology such that we have autonomy & intelligent flight systems that enable cheaper operation of the spacecraft," Stofan offered. Should missions call for planetary or comet & asteroid exploration, capabilities include aero-capture, networks of small spacecraft, landers, sample acquisition & analysis, she explained. In the general area of flight systems, Wilson noted that the highest priority seems to be emerging in terms of onboard autonomy; new, more affordable approaches to operating the spacecraft; station keeping & precision control of clusters & networks; more efficient, non-nuclear energy collection & storage & high-energy density storage.. i  While many technologies can enhance mission capabilities, the focus of the New Millennium Program will be on revolutionary breakthroughs that offer significant mission cost reductions, enable frequent missions, & address the "tall poles" for space exploration in the 21st century. o Onboard autonomy or new ways to operate multiple spacecraft, including autonomous navigation & closed-loop feature tracking; also, self commanding & health monitoring must be done on board, instead of requiring ground in the loop; information system architecture that can be migrated back & forth between the ground & the spacecraft. i 
Benefits of Model-based Autonomy
85% (18)
http: //ic. arc. nasa. gov/ ic/ projects/ mba/ presentations/ mars98/ sld017. htm
24/7/2001

Benefits of Model-based Autonomy

     i  NASA would like to establish a virtual presence in space by flying tens or hundreds of small, cheap, intelligent spacecraft at once.
    Sending complex physical systems into space presents a number of problems produce the requirement for autonomy.
  • Limited communication - radio signals may take a few minutes to an hour to reach the spacecraft, making the response time of ground based commanding long. i  There is only 1 Deep Space Network which allows NASA to communicate with spacecraft outside of earths neighborhood, so the more communication each spacecraft requires the fewer that can be flown.
  • Multiple components onboard a spacecraft will fail or degrade over time. Control software must be smart enough to properly control the spacecraft even with any of the huge number of possible failure combinations.
  • Shrinking budgets - missions can no longer take 7 years & a 1000000 $ to develop. i 
  • Increasing demands - scientists & explorers would like to undertake missions that simple cannot be accomplished via continuous control of the spacecraft from the ground.
Planetary Society: Headline for 4/16/98
85% (19)
http: //www. planetary. org/ html/ news/ articlearchive/ headlines/ 1998/ headln- 042098. html
unknown date

Planetary Society: Headline for 4/16/98

 i  The delay is due to a combination of late delivery of the spacecraft's power electronics system & an ambitious flight software development schedule, which together leave insufficient time to test the spacecraft thoroughly for a July launch.   i  Deep Space 1 is the 1st launch in NASA's New Millennium program, a series of missions designed to test new technologies so that they can be confidently used on science missions of the 21st century. i  Mission planners will announce the new targets for this mission by the end of May. i  The bottom line is that SEP requires far less propellant than a chemical rocket to deliver the same payload mass to a target, It takes time for the gentle thrust to build up high spacecraft velocity, so SEP is appropriate only for missions requiring high energy or long trips.   If a technology fails during the flight, even if it causes the loss of the spacecraft, we may still regard the mission as a success if it achieves the program goal of reducing the risk for future science missions. i  Autonomy,..., can help reduce the heavy burden on NASA's Deep Space Network (DSN). With autonomy technologies allowing spacecraft to operate for longer times without detailed instructions from Earth, the precious resources of the DSN can go further. i  If the autonomy systems on DS1 perform as planned, future mission teams can be more confident about leaving important decisions to the spacecraft.   i 
The Impact of Autonomy Technology on Spacecraft Software Architecture: A Case Study
85% (20)
http: //www. computer. org/ intelligent/ ex1998/ x5069abs. htm
1/3/2002

The Impact of Autonomy Technology on Spacecraft Software Architecture: A Case Study

69-75 The Impact of Autonomy Technology on Spacecraft Software Architecture: A Case Study
The authors draw on their experience with the autonomy technology demonstration on NASA's Deep Space One mission to describe the wide-ranging effect autonomy will have on the development of spacecraft software. Autonomy technology for high-level, closed-loop control of spacecraft offers considerable benefits to space-flight projects. Those benefits can enable whole new classes of missions; however, they aren't without cost. In this article, they describe both the impact that autonomy technology has on spacecraft software & the implications for the software architecture that arise from those impacts. Some of the impacts are inherent in the challenging problems generally confronted in the spacecraft domain yet are exacerbated by autonomy technology.
A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy - Biesiadecki, Jain (ResearchIndex)
85% (21)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ 60661. html
7/3/2002

A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy - Biesiadecki, Jain (ResearchIndex)

(...)
Abstract: A key goal of NASA's New Millennium Program (NMP) is the development of technology for increasing spacecraft on-board autonomy. Achievement of this objective requires the development of a new class of ground-based autonomy testbeds that can enable the low-cost & rapid design, test & integration of the spacecraft autonomy flight software. This paper describes the development of an Autonomy Testbed Environment (ATBE) for the NMP Deep Space I comet/asteroid rendezvous mission.for the various actuators & sensors on a spacecraft. Cited by: More Advanced Simulation Environment for Autonomous Spacecraft - Jeffrey Biesiadecki (1997) (...) Active bibliography (...): More All 0.3 : May 28, 1999 - (...) 0.1 : Recursive Flexible Multibody System Dynamics using Spatial.. -(...) BibTeX entry: (Update) J. Biesiadecki, A. Jain, "A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy," in Simulators for European Space Programmes, 4th Workshop, (...), Oct.html More @misc{ biesiadecki96reconfigurable, author = "J. Biesiadecki & A. Jain", title = "A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy", text = "J. Biesiadecki, A. Jain, A Reconfigurable Testbed Environment for Spacecraft Autonomy, in Simulators for European Space Programmes, 4th Workshop, (...), Oct. 1991 3 Real--Time Simulation of the Cassini Spacecraft Using DARTS:.. i 
A Hybrid Procedural/Deductive Executive For Autonomous Spacecraft - Pell, Gamble, Gat, Keesing, Kurien, Millar, Nayak, Plaunt, Williams (ResearchIndex)
84% (22)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ 2644. html
6/3/2002

A Hybrid Procedural/Deductive Executive For Autonomous Spacecraft - Pell, Gamble, Gat, Keesing, Kurien, Millar, Nayak, Plaunt, Williams (ResearchIndex)

ps berkeley.edu/papers/aams99/aams99.ps Cached: PS.gz PS PDF Image Update Help From: nasa.gov/ic/projects/E ... autonomy (more) From: nasa.gov/ic/projects/E ... autonomy Home: B.Pell E.Gamble E.Gat P.Nayak C.Plaunt B.Williams [2] [3] HPSearch (...)
(...)
Abstract: The New Millennium Remote Agent (NMRA) will be the 1st AI system to control an actual spacecraft. The spacecraft domain places a strong premium on autonomy & requires dynamic recoveries & robust concurrent execution, all in the presence of tight real-time deadlines, changing goals, scarce resource constraints, & a wide variety of possible failures. (1998) (...) 0.4 : Plan Execution for Autonomous Spacecraft - Barney Pell (1996) (...) 0.3 : A Remote Agent Prototype for Spacecraft Autonomy - Pell (1996) (...) Related documents from co-citation: More All 2 : Robust periodic planning & execution for autonomous spacecraft - Pell, Gat et al.2 : A remote agent prototype for spacecraft autonomy - Pell, Bernard et al. - i  html" } Citations (...): 277 Programming in Prolog (...) - Clocksin, Mellish - 1981 262 Logical Foundations of AI ?  (...) - Genesereth, Nilsson - 1987 165 plan: the open planning architecture (...) - Currie, Tate - 1991 153 Golog: A logic programming language for dynamic domains - Levesque, Reiter et al. - i  (...) - Gat - 1996 27 Managing deliberation & reasoning in real-time ai systems (...) - Ingrand, Georgeff - 1990 24 Design of the remote agent experiment for spacecraft autonom.. - i  (...) - Georgeff, Lansky - 1986 3 Planning agents - Pollock - 1998 3 Managing decision resources in plan execution (...) - Freed, Remington - 1997 Documents on the same site (...): More The Remote Agent Executive: Capabilities to Support.. - i 
IAE'99 - Science Directed Spacecraft Autonomy for Mars Missions
84% (23)
http: //www. jpl. nasa. gov/ iae/ highlights/ yr- end99/ autonomy/ autonomy. htm
4/2/2000

IAE'99 - Science Directed Spacecraft Autonomy for Mars Missions

Science Directed Spacecraft Autonomy for Mars Missions
 i  Researchers at NASA are now turning their attention to the implementation of powerful new analysis tools for satellite imagery on MPP's, in order to obtain direct information about important physical processes that until now has often remained buried within these large datasets.   The system could be deployed onboard a spacecraft to select regions of interest to be imaged in higher resolution. Given a library of reference images from previous missions, future missions could apply the system in real time to search for regions of possible surface motion since the reference images were taken. The software could then flag regions that show movement for retargeting at high resolution as high-payoff scientific targets.   Stolorz, P., Cheeseman, P. (1998). Onboard science data analysis: Applying data mining to science-directed autonomy. i  However, its  ? possible that there are active dunes on Mars which change on longer time scales than are available during the MGS mission; therefore, high resolution MGS should form the basis of an image database to be used for on board motion mapping in future missions.     Expanded version of Science Directed Spacecraft Autonomy for Mars Missions
Remote Agent Publications
84% (24)
http: //ic. arc. nasa. gov/ ic/ projects/ remote- agent/ publications. html
11/9/2001

Remote Agent Publications

  • InProceedings of the 4th International Symposium on AI ? , Robotics, & Automation for Space (i-SAIRAS),July 1997.
  • InProceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on AI ?  (AAAI-98).
  • InProceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on AI ?  (IJCAI-99)
A Hybrid Procedural/Deductive Executive For Autonomous Spacecraft - Pell, Gamble, Gat, Keesing, Kurien, Millar, Nayak, Plaunt, Williams (ResearchIndex)
84% (25)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ 110171. html
6/3/2002

A Hybrid Procedural/Deductive Executive For Autonomous Spacecraft - Pell, Gamble, Gat, Keesing, Kurien, Millar, Nayak, Plaunt, Williams (ResearchIndex)

(...)
Abstract: The New Millennium Remote Agent (NMRA) will be the 1st AI system to control an actual spacecraft. The spacecraft domain places a strong premium on autonomy & requires dynamic recoveries & robust concurrent execution, all in the presence of tight real-time deadlines, changing goals, scarce resource constraints, & a wide variety of possible failures. Cited by: More Agent Technology from a NASA Perspective - Walt Truszkowski Harold (1999) (...) Design of the Remote Agent Experiment for Spacecraft.. - (1997) (...) 0.3 : Model-based Autonomy for Robust Mars Operations - Kurien, Nayak, Williams (...) Users who viewed this document also viewed: More All 0.1 : An Updated Survey of GA-Based Multiobjective Optimization.. - (1998) (...) 0.4 : Plan Execution for Autonomous Spacecraft - Barney Pell (1996) (...) 0.3 : A Remote Agent Prototype for Spacecraft Autonomy - Pell (1996) (...) Related documents from co-citation: More All 2 : Robust periodic planning & execution for autonomous spacecraft - Pell, Gat et al.2 : A remote agent prototype for spacecraft autonomy - Pell, Bernard et al. - i  html" } Citations (...): 277 Programming in Prolog (...) - Clocksin, Mellish - 1981 262 Logical Foundations of AI ?  (...) - Genesereth, Nilsson - 1987 165 plan: the open planning architecture (...) - Currie, Tate - 1991 153 Golog: A logic programming language for dynamic domains - Levesque, Reiter et al. - i  (...) - Gat - 1996 27 Managing deliberation & reasoning in real-time ai systems (...) - Ingrand, Georgeff - 1990 24 Design of the remote agent experiment for spacecraft autonom.. - i 
Brian C. Williams
84% (26)
http: //www. ai. mit. edu/ people/ williams/ williams. shtml
unknown date

Brian C. Williams

Williams' research concentrates on model-based autonomy -- the creation of long-lived autonomous systems that are able to explore, command, diagnose & repair them selves using fast, commonsense reasoning. i  Brian Williams received his S.B., S.M & Ph.D. from MIT in Computer Science & AI ?  in 1989. i  He has served as guest editor of the AI ?  Journal & has been on the editorial boards of the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, & MIT Press.
    • Special volume on Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems II, AI ? .
    • AI ?  103(1-2):5-48.
    • Immobile Robots: AI ?  in the New Millenium.
    • Design of the Remote Agent Experiment for Spacecraft Autonomy.
    • A Remote Agent Prototype for Spacecraft Autonomy.
Plan Execution for Autonomous Spacecraft - Pell, Gat, Keesing, Muscettola, Smith (ResearchIndex)
84% (27)
http: //citeseer. nj. nec. com/ pell96plan. html<